LPP Members in America Endorse Wilson Tarpeh for Liberian Senate

... Montserrado by-election to cost US$1.2 million

by Jay Nagbe Sloh
Managing Editor

Philadelphia, 10/13/09 (SIS) - The United States branch of the opposition Liberian People's Party (LPP) has unanimously endorsed Professor Wilson Kargioh Tarpeh, the candidate jointly being fielded by LPP and the United People's Party (UPP), in the ensuing Montserrado County senatorial by-election, slated for November 10, 2009. Tarpeh faces 11 other candidates, including former presidential contender Alhaji Gohee Vamuyan Kromah.

The branch says it will work closely with its mother party in Liberia and Professor Tarpeh's campaign committee - within the confines of the Elections Law and Constitution of Liberia - to ensure victory for the candidate.

U.S.-based LPP partisans have been holding meetings and plotting strategies to ensure victory for Tarpeh, who finished 4th for the same Monstserrado senatorial election in 2005. LPP-USA spokesman George Hina Willie Kpator says another LPP teleconference meeting is scheduled for this Friday, October 17, 2009, to put finishing touches to their action plan in support of Professor Tarpeh.

The National Elections Commission (NEC), working with key international partners, will conducting a by-election to fill the vacancy created in the Liberian Senate by the death of junior senator Hannah G. Brent.
Montserrado, currently Liberia's most populous county, has a territorial area of 737 square miles (1,909 square kilometers). It has 14 electoral districts, 496,508 registered voters, 280 voting precincts, and 989 polling places.
NEC say's the ensuing Montserrado by-election will cost 1.2 million United States dollars.
NEC has two magisterial areas in Montserrado. Messrs. Vopea Gongloe and James Cordor are the Elections Magistrates the county.

Since 2005, NEC has conducted five by-elections to fill in vacancies in the House of Representatives and two senatorial by-elections. This is the third senatorial by-election since 2005.

Fussing Over Morlu-Obama Meeting

By Jay Nagbe Sloh
Managing Editor
Sloh Information Service

Introduction
On Monday, July 13, 2009, the United States Embassy near Monrovia issued a press release in which it "categorically denied" that the head of the Forum for the Establishment of a War Crimes Court in Liberia, Mr. Mulbah Morlu, met with President Barack Obama in Accra, Ghana, last Saturday as Morlu claimed. The Embassy said: “There was no such meeting or conversation between the two men”.

Before the Embassy’s clarification, FrontPageAfrica, an online media outlet, reported on July 12, 2009 that Mr. Morlu and the Executive Mansion were "embroiled in exchanges" over Morlu's claim he met with President Obama in Accra, Ghana, on Saturday, July 11, 2009. It quoted Morlu as saying he held20a six-minute discussion with Obama who was in Ghana on his first visit to sub-saharan Africa as President of America. However, Liberian President Ellen Sirleaf, shun by the Obama Administration since Obama took office last January, jumped into disputing Morlu's claim of meeting with Obama. FrontPageAfrica quoted her spokesman, Cyrus Badio, as describing Morlu’s claim of the meeting as false. Dr. Abdullah Dukule and other Liberians, either paid and/or sympathetic to the Sirleaf Government, also joined the President's chorus refuting Morlu's claim.

Before and after the Embassy’s clarification, the exchanges between Morlu (on one side) and the Mansion and its agents (on the other hand) had raised more concerns and questions than answers: Did Morlu meet with Obama? Who arranged the meeting? Where - exactly - in Accra was it held? Why would the President of Liberia abandon burning national issues, such as her current indictment by the TRC, to worry about a Liberian citizen's meeting with the head of a foreign government?

Reputation of Morlu and his organization
Credibility is the first requirement in the human rights business. As such, we hold human righ ts organizations and their officers, such as Morlu and his group, responsible for what they write, say, and/or publish. The Embassy's refutation of Morlu's claim dwarfs any ounce of reputation he and his group may have built locally and internationally. It questions the legitimacy of its past activities and public statements while seriously eroding public trust in the group and its officers for the future.

Morlu's statement really sounded so believable that the denial from the American Government now reminds me about one kind of liar Bishop Marwiah once spoke about on Liberian television. He said this kind of liar (I have forgotten the exact name) works so smartly that even his/her victims would believe him/her. Morlu did not only claiming a meeting, he also attached a timeline to his "meeting" with Obama - claiming it took six minutes. Listen to him: "I can tell you for sure, I met President Obama on Saturday in Accra, Ghana, the purpose for which we flew to that country. People who are saying that we did not meet Obama are ashamed because you can remember sometime ago Madam Sirleaf left this country and stayed over a month in America lobbying to see Obama but to no avail. They are ashamed that a little advocate like me was able to meet Obama” (FrontPageAfrica.com, July 12, 2009)."

Although I had no information to conclude that this guy was telling the truth, he came across truthful (and the American Government was still mute on his claim) that I told a friend it would take more than expression of mere "doubts" by the President and her agents to block him out of believability. On one hand, Morlu had made his claim, and he appeared not to care whether or not anyone - the Liberian Government in particular - believed his claim. After all, he was representing his organization, not anyone else (especially those doubting him). On the other hand, the Liberian Government was accusing him of lying.

Under the law, I thought (rightly so) that the burden of proof lied on the shoulders of the accusers, the Liberian Government and its agents thought, and I still believe, that the Liberian Government had a responsibility to convince us, through the preponderance of evidence, that the "meeting" was a hoax. The U.S. Embassy has done the accuser's job for them. So, now that the cat is out of the bag, the honorable thing for Morlu and his group to do is to immediately apologize to the U.S. Government publicly and shut down their operations because no one would trust and/or believe them anymore. A lesser way out is for Morlu to resign or be fired, unless he is the sole owner as is the case with many brief-case organizations.

Meeting arrangement
I was not really concerned about who arranged the meeting. Firstly, the name of the person who arranged the "meeting" and the channel of the arrangement were, in my view, irrelevant than whether it actually took place. I cared les s because if a meeting took place between two parties, any of them could have arranged it directly with the other or through third parties. Interestingly, the U.S. Government - whose current Ambassador is a proven expert on current events - had not refuted Morlu's claim.

When FrontPageAfrica asked Morlu who arranged the meeting, he told them that he wrote President Obama in January this year, requesting a meeting with him to justify his request for the United States to support the establishment of a war crimes court in Liberia. “We have people in Washington who are members of the Forum for the Establishment for War Crimes Court in Liberia. So when I wrote President Obama, they have been following up on the letter and our meeting with President Obama, but for their security, I will not call names now,” Morlu continued.

He claimed he received confirmation to meet with President Obama before Obama made the trip to Africa. For me, that was enough information to answer this question. In addition to how Morlu claims his meeting was arranged, I also know that there could have been other sources who arranged the meeting. U.S. diplomacy works in many ways and manners that, sometimes, only those associated with particular events/issues know about them.

The current U.S. Ambassador in Liberia is very, very friendly and sympathetic to private organizations like the one Mulbah heads. She COULD (key word) and may have arranged a private meeting between Mulbah and Obama directly or through the State Department, the White House itself, or her counterpart (American Ambassador in Ghana)? You bet!

Did Charles Taylor actually break jail in these United States where I have lived for 12 years now? No way! American diplomacy released him and unleashed him onto Liberia. Also, the Doe Government alleged, and it is widely believed, that American diplomacy surreptitiously took Quiwonkpa out of Liberia in a "suitcase" and safely landed his entire family in America before he returned in 1985 with his failed "patriotic forces."

Additionally, it is widely believed that American diplomacy split Prince Johnson and Taylor in the bushes and "gave" Johnson intelligence and communication equipment linked to the U.S. embassy. I am sure we still remember "Tango" cutting Samuel Doe's ears on September 9, 1990 and he calling "sunshine" to "speak with Mr. Porter or the Ambassador" for instruction on what to do with Doe. Mr. Porter was then the political officer at the U.S. Embassy.

As Morlu rightly said, the Sirleaf Government has not entered the Obama Government's radar of friendship. President Sirleaf, who visited George Bush's White House and met with Bush several times in a short period, has reportedly made several unsuccessful attempts to see Obama. In fact, Bush visited Monrovia before leaving office. His wife, Laura, and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice earlier attended Sirleaf's inauguration in January, 2006. When the White House announced the President was planning a visit to Africa, the Sirleaf Government unsuccessfully tried to pull him into Monrovia.

I mention these to make the point that the same reasons that keep Ellen and Barrack apart could be the very same reasons that could (key word) inform and engineer Barrack's friendship with a so-called anti-Ellen figure like Morlu, Jay Nagbe Sloh, or Dennis Jah. In fact, Barrack is a human who has feelings that can be hurt. In the early stage of the last American presidential race, Ellen came to Washington, and publicly endorsed Hilary Clinton over six other democrats, claiming women made better leaders than men. I wonder where she drew that untested opinion.

Even George Bush, I am sure, was surprised by the endorsement. I am sure, considering his loose friendship with Ellen, that he expected her to either be neutral or quiet (as diplomacy requires) or endorse Bush's choice (which he had not made at the time). To help Obama make his case of not wanting to meet with Ellen, his Government has a policy of not doing any business with a corrupt and brutal Government. Ellen's Government is guilty of both. Rampant corruption is the order of the day in Liberia. Morlu was still nursing wounds of police brutality when he "met" with Obama.

With all of these, anyone could have arranged the meeting, and Obama would have been expected to be open to such meeting. Meeting venueI had very little interest in knowing the exact location of the meeting because: (1) If they actually met, the meeting could have been held anywhere in Accra where Obama was; (2) More so, not every activity of Obama in Ghana was public; (3) Obama's arrival and departure were both in the night hours, and the meeting could have taken place during those hours; (4) Obama spent some time at his Embassy in Ghana and slept in some structure in Ghana. They could have met at any of these places. Above all, I believed, and I still think, that it is the right of both parties to keep the details of their meeting private.

Liberian President's involvement
FrontPageAfrica reported (July 12, 2009): "Presidential Press Secretary Cyrus Baddio Sunday phoned FrontPageAfrica to ascertain the source of the information regarding Morlu’s meeting with Obama going as far as to doubt the authenticity of the information. Pressed as to what sources the government was relying on to disprove Morlu's claims, Badio de clined to offer a response. But said the Executive Mansion ha d information that Morlu's meeting with Obama never took place. Another figure closed to the Executive Mansion media circle, Abdoulaye Dukule, emailed an article to FPA in which he declared that Morlu is not saying the truth concerning his pronounced meeting with President Obama."

Although the U.S. Government has now refuted Morlu's claim and we know he lied, I still do not understand the Liberian Government's involvement in this "you say, I say." Let's agree that Morlu was "blowing his own air "about meeting with the U.S. President as the truth has revealed. Or, better still, let us assume that the meeting actually took place. What makes either case the Liberian Government's business that its officials, paid with tax payer dollars, spend sleepless nights and government funds fighting to disprove it? Did Morlu use Government resources on the trip? Was Morlu a functionary of the Government when he "met" with Obama?

Why would the President of Liberia abandon burning national issues, such as her current indictment by the TRC, to worry about a Liberian citizen's private meeting with the head of a foreign government? Why would the President of Liberia abandon burning national issues, such as rampant corruption and escalating armed robbery, to worry about a Liberian citizen's private meeting with the head of a foreign government? Why would the President of Liberia abandon burning national issues, such as the lack of electricity and safe drinking water, to worry about a Liberian citizen's private meeting with the head of a foreign government?

Why would the President of Liberia abandon burning national issues, such as death traps sitting around Liberia calling themselves health care facilities, to worry about a Liberian citizen's private meeting with the head of a foreign government? I want to know why the President of Liberia would abandon burning national issues, such as mountains of dirt in and around Monrovia, to worry about a Liberian citizen's private meeting with the head of a foreign government. Instead of President Sirleaf and her mouth-pieces abandoning burning national issues, such as lack of quality education, to worry about a Liberian citizen's private meeting with the head of a foreign government, some of us want to know where the Liberian Government spends the millions of U.S. and Liberian dollars it gets from taxes and grants that Liberia now has to rely upon the goodwill of the Chinese Government to pave our roads and build other infrastructure.

Involvement of Ellen's surrogates
One of the Liberian Government's surrogates, Dr. Abdoulaye W. Dukulé, who is said to be one of the Government's highly paid agents abroad, refuting Morlu's claim of the meeting, said : “We will not go as far asking about Mr. Morlu’s commitment to his cause. It seems to be the only thing he does, day in day out. Just like a few people in Liberia have turned “Standard Bearer and Presidential Candidate” into a profession, Mr. Morlu seems to have no other job but to call attention to his cause: the institution of a war crime tribunal in Liberia. How far will he go to be taken seriously? He has been arrested on numerous occasions and released, just as people get arrested and released in Washington, DC, on a daily basis when protesting for cause. Some time back in 2008, he was arrested by calling President Sirleaf a rebel and asking for her resignation and prosecution. The President, out of the country at the time, ordered that his release as soon as she returned home... On the day foreign dignitaries were coming to Liberia for the International Women Colloquium, he called for a demonstration against Mrs. Sirleaf. He has been relentless. Meeting US President Obama would have been the icing on the cake” (FrontPageAfrica, July 12, 2009).

What is the connection between Morlu's claim he met with Obama and this tirade? Of all the irrelevant questions Dukule asked in his article, published by the Liberian Journal, this one is funny: "To what extend would some people go in our current fragile situation to make a name for themselves and a few bucks?" How many "bucks" has he not made from the Liberian Government for public relations campaigns that have generated no positive result for a Government buried under rampant corruption? Or he wants us to believe that he is the only one for whom "few bucks" are justified. Dr. Dukule sits in his "glass house" and wants to throw stones. We are told that John Morlu's audit reports contain his name for heavy payments for public relations. Can the same be said about Mulbah Morlu? I hope so.

Conclusion
I believe the Liberian Government should shut up about Morlu's "meeting" with Obama and concentrate on the work for which it was "elected." After all, meetings between private Liberian citizens and foreign governments are not the Liberian Government's business. There are many pressing national issues that the Government needs to address instead of wasting our money on who private Liberians dine with. As I said earlier, the time has come for Morlu to the honorable thing: Resign or dissolve the group and find place to sit down since you no longer have any credibility.About the author: Jay Nagbe Sloh is a Lierian journalist who has worked for several Liberian and foreign media organizations. He can be reached at townchief@aol.com, slohinfoservice@aol.com, or 267 679 4455.

Harry Greaves Compares Two LPRC Contracts

COMPARISON OF MEG CONTRACT AND ZAKHEM CONTRACT

On October 13, 2005, then-Managing Director Edwin M. Snowe Jr. signed a US$12 million contract with Mechanical Engineering Group for certain renovation work to the Bushrod Island Product Storage Terminal (the MEG contract).
On April 18, 2006, Managing Director Harry A. Greaves Jr. notified MEG that the LPRC Board of Directors, having reviewed the matter, had declared the MEG contract to be null and void because the contract had never been approved by the LPRC Board and the contract had numerous substantive and procedural deficiencies.

On May 1, 2009, following a two-year international competitive bidding process, LPRC entered into a US$24.8 million contract with Zakhem International Construction Ltd for the renovation of the Product Storage Terminal (the Zakhem contract). MEG was one of five companies pre-qualified to bid but withdrew at the last minute because they were unable to meet our stringent “stipulated terms and conditions and in particular those pertaining to advance payment, performance security, bid bond and timing of (contract) payment terms” (direct quote from September 10, 2008 email message from MEG general manager).

The Zakhem contract price tag of US$24.8 million includes US$13.7 million of improve-ments over the MEG contract necessary to bring the terminal up to international standards. When inflation is factored in for cost changes between 2005 and 2009, the Zakhem contract is actually US$1.9 million cheaper than the MEG contract on an “apples-to-apples” basis.
Mr. Snowe's public statements that the two contracts cover the same amount of work are not true. This report compares the most significant differences between the MEG contract and the Zakhem contract.

Concrete foundations Of Existing tanks
The concrete foundations on which the existing tanks sit are all in severely deteriorated condition and need to be replaced. This is a major part of the terminal renovations.
Under the Zakhem contract the existing tanks will be jacked up, the existing foundations will be removed, and new concrete foundations will be installed. The MEG contract provided for only partial repairs, without using a lifting procedure for the tanks to be rehabilitated, including Texaco tanks 5, 6 and 8, and Mobil tanks 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407 and 408.
Under the MEG contract, no repairs were prescribed for the foundations of tank numbers 1, 2, 7 and 401.

No quantification of the magnitude of repair work is specified in the MEG contract. But it is clear that the very small amounts budgeted by MEG indicate that the intent was to perform superficial patch work only.
This difference alone rendered the MEG specification unacceptable for LPRC’s needs. In contrast, the Zakhem contract provides for a full replacement of all the foundations.

API TESTING OF TANKS:
The repair procedures on existing tanks and the construction of new tanks require a testing procedure according to American Petroleum Institute (API) standards. These tests include filling the tanks completely with water and inspecting and testing them to insure structural integrity and to prevent leakage.
The MEG contract did not provide for these tests to be performed on any of the tanks. Under the Zakhem contract, each tank will be API tested.

Bottom Material Disposal
The rehabilitation work to be conducted on existing tanks, including the repair or renewal of tank bottoms, will require the removal of accumulations of scale, water and oily material. The removal and disposal of this material and other debris represents a costly procedure.
The MEG contract did not include costs to perform this operation on any tank. The Zakhem contract provides for this work.

TANK FLOOR RENEWAL OF EXISTING TANKS
It is expected that all the existing tank floors will require full renewal of the floor plates due to the age of the terminal and occasional inspections of several tanks in the past.
This is provided for in the Zakhem contract. The MEG contract only covered costs for sand blasting and coating of the tank floors.

FLOATING INTERIOR COVERS FOR GASOLINE TANKS
Floating covers are required on the existing gasoline tanks to reduce ongoing costly evaporation losses. Installations of these covers are included in the Zakhem contract. The MEG contract does not include floating covers for gasoline tanks 403, 404 and 407.

NEW ROOFS FOR EXISTING TANKS
All of the existing tank roofs require full renewal due to the age of the terminal and occasional past inspections of several tanks. The Zakhem contract provides for full roof replacement. The MEG contract included costs for only partial replacement of individual damaged roof plates, without quantifying the extent of plate replacement.

NEW STORAGE TANKS
Three new tanks with a total capacity of 25,400 cubic meters are required to insure security of supply for the country, as demand increases over the years.
The Zakhem contract budgeted for this necessary extra capacity. The MEG contract included costs for only two new storage tanks (nos 3 and 4), with a total capacity of only 15, 400 cubic meters.

Tank field PIPES, VALVES AND ACCESSORIES
A full renewal of the entire piping network is required in both the Mobil and the Texaco tank fields, due to damaged conditions and inefficient operational procedures. The Zakhem contract provides for this new piping. The MEG contract has included costs for only partial refurbishment.”
The quantity discrepancies are as follows:
q 4 inch lines: 350 meters by MEG versus 700 meters by Zakhem
q 6 inch lines: 1250 meters by MEG versus 1000 meters by Zakhem
q 8 inch lines: 450 meters by MEG versus 800 meters by Zakhem
Further, unlike the Zakhem contract, the MEG contract did not include any costs for the required pipe racks, gate valves and flanges or the essential pressure testing procedures for the piping. The MEG contract also failed to include necessary sand blasting and epoxy coatings of the pipes.

SUPPLY PIPELINES FROM THE JETTY
Three separate 700 meter long pipelines with 8, 10 and 12 inch diameters are needed to carry jet/kerosene, gasoline and diesel products, respectively, from the end of the jetty into the terminal. The MEG contract covered the costs for 4500 meters of 8 inch pipe for three pipelines running from the tank farm to the jetty platform, including the length of lines on the jetty itself. This is greater in scope than is required. The 2,100 meters of 8, 10, and 12 inch pipe included in the Zakhem contract is roughly equivalent in installed cost to 2,400 meters of 8 inch pipe.
Extra costs for 4,500 meters minus 2,100m = 2,400m of 8 inch line at an average cost of $420 per meter (calculated in accordance to MEG bid cost) were estimated. MEG has also included pipeline walkway protection amounting to $ 270,000, together with $55,000 for marine hoses.

Adjustments for unnecessary costs in the MEG contract were estimated at $1,498,000 and are deducted from the total MEG bid value for comparison purposes. Supplemental costs for larger pipe diameter in the Zakhem contract were added to the extra cost associated with the 2008 scope of work.

FIRE PROTECTION
A completely new fire water distribution piping network equivalent to 1300 meters is required, accompanied by a fire water tank and adequate pumping capacity.
The MEG contract included a fire water tank capacity of 1,400 cubic meters, compared to a required capacity of 2,158 cubic meters, as is provided for in the Zakhem contract.
The Zakhem contract provides for a 1600 meter 8 inch fire water line to the jetty platform. The MEG contract provided nothing for this.

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Environmental protection measures were never considered in the MEG contract.
The Zakhem contract responds fully to important soil and water environmental considerations, providing for concrete pads, concrete dykes around tanks, soil preparation and protection within the tank dyke areas, and an API oil-water separator.
None of these protections were in the MEG contract.

SECURITY AND SAFETY
Security and safety devices and equipment were not provided for in the MEG contract.
The Zakhem contract provides extensive floodlighting, including all the electricals and cabling for these, as well as extensive remote surveillance cameras and monitors.

TESTING LABORATORY BUILDING
A new product testing laboratory building is not provided for in the MEG contract. Only the cost of testing equipment is covered.
In contrast, the Zakhem contract provides for the construction of a new 1,000 sq ft laboratory building.

DAMAGES FOR DELAY IN COMPLETION
Notwithstanding the consensus that time is important to this work, the MEG contract provision covering liquidated damages in the event of delay by the contractor in completing the work provided very little protection to LPRC. The MEG contract specified that the liquidated damages to be imposed against the contractor would be at a flat rate of $500 per day: Using a six-day work week, this would have limited the maximum liquidated damages to $3,000 per week. Consequently, under the MEG contract, even a delay as long as an entire year would have entitled LPRC to liquidated damages from MEG of only $156,000.

In contrast, the Zakhem contract creates a strong incentive for the contractor to stay on the completion schedule, with a penalty of US$10,000 per tank for each day of delay.
PAYMENT SCHEDULE AND WORK PROGRESS
The payment terms under the two contracts are very different.

The Zakhem contract provides for a series of progress payments based upon work completed and invoices submitted to and certified as acceptable by LPRC.

In contrast, the MEG contract required LPRC to make a 10% down payment to MEG followed by thirty-three (33) equal monthly installments of US$ 290,779.37 to MEG irrespective of the amount of work completed at each installment due date.

PAYMENT LIEN
The MEG contract established an elaborate mechanism to guarantee payments to MEG that essentially placed payments to MEG as LPRC’s highest priority, ahead of all other creditors and LPRC’s essential operations requirements. Under the MEG contract, anticipated income from LPRC’s top two importers would have been diverted to a special account dedicated for payments to MEG.

The MEG contract required that LPRC issue instructions to West Oil Incorporated and Mobil Oil Liberia Limited (now TOTAL), to deposit into a restricted account at Ecobank Liberia 60% of all sums due to LPRC for maintenance and storage fees for the period of the contract. This restricted account was to be automatically debited in favor of a MEG account at Ecobank for the monthly installments due to MEG under the MEG contract.

There was no cap on the amount of the deposits into this restricted account and thus, it would have been impossible to determine if the sums deposited were proportional to the sums that became due under the MEG Contract.

The MEG contract even provided that Ecobank could create an “overdraft” in the restricted account to insure monthly payments to MEG.

No such provisions are in the Zakhem contract. LPRC will pay Zakhem upon receipt and approval of invoices for work completed.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST
As part of its review of the MEG contract, the new LPRC management discovered that when the MEG contract was signed, 70% of the shares of MEG were owned by Jamal and Ghassan Basma of West Oil, then LPRC’s largest importer of petroleum products. As is noted above, the owners of West Oil were to in effect guarantee to themselves (as owners of MEG) payments on the MEG contract by obtaining a lien against LRPC’s future storage and handling fees from West Oil.

This conflict of interest was never disclosed to LPRC’s Board of Directors, nor to the technical and financial committees established by LPRC to evaluate the bids, nor to the Contracts & Monopolies Commission.

PROFIT GUARANTEE
The MEG contract added a substantial guaranteed contractor’s profit in the event of termination of the contract by LPRC. The MEG contract stated:

“13.5 In the event that the Agreement is terminated by the Contractor because of the default of the Owner, the Contractor shall be entitled to damages that equal the amount outstanding for the cost and value of all works completed and the materials and workmanship furnished plus lost profit of at least 10% of the total Contract price.”

No such provision exists in the Zakhem contract.

AFFORDABILITY OF CONTRACT
The MEG contract was for US$12 million, payable in equal monthly installments over three years after an initial downpayment of US$1.2 million. Before the contract was signed by the then-Managing Director, no cash flow projections were performed to determine whether LPRC could afford such a payment schedule, in addition to paying salaries and operating expenses and meeting its obligations to the government,

A few days before the current Liberian government took office, two payments totaling US$550,000.00 were made by LPRC to MEG. These payment left only US$50,000 in LPRC’s bank account. As consequence of these payments, LPRC was left with insufficient funds to meet its January 2006 payroll. LPRC was required to obtain advances on storage fees from importers in order to fund the January 2006 payroll.

It is abundantly clear that LPRC could not afford the MEG contract when it was signed by the then-Managing Director. Perhaps that is why the MEG contract was never approved by the LPRC Board of Directors.

Since coming into office, the current administration of LPRC has put LPRC on a sound financial footing. Additionally, LPRC has developed a precise plan for funding the Zakhem contract. On March 20, 2009, LPRC’s funding plan was approved by the Minister of Commerce & Industry.

PERMITS
The Zakhem contract provides that the contractor is responsible for obtaining all necessary permits for completing the contracted work. On the other hand, the MEG contract provides that LPRC is responsible for obtaining such permits.

PERFORMANCE SECURITY
The Zakhem contract requires the contractor to secure a performance security equal to 25% of the total contract price (i.e. approximately US$6,000,000).

The MEG contract only required the contractor to secure a performance security equal to 10% of the total contract price (i.e. approximately US$1,200,000). Additionally, this performance bond was discharged upon presentation by MEG and acceptance by LPRC of an invoice in an amount of at least 10% of the contract price, at which point in time there would be no performance security.

COST COMPARISON
The following table summarizes the comparison of costs between the two contracts. Extra costs associated with items covered by the Zakhem contract, but not included under the MEG contract, amount to US$13.758 million in 2009 dollars. Put another way, if the scope of work in the Zakhem contract had been the same as the scope of work in the MEG contract, the cost of the Zakhem contract would have amounted to US$11.058 million in 2009 dollars.

Adjusting this US$11.058 million for the effects of inflation, using construction material cost indices averaging a 29% escalation from mid-2005 to late 2008, results in an estimated cost of US$8.572 million in 2005 dollars for the Zakhem work. Further, adjusting for items covered in the MEG contract but not covered by Zakhem (comprising the jetty/supply pipelines) increases the hypothetical Zakhem contract amount to some US$10.947 million in 2005 dollars or US$1.924 million lower than MEG’s contract amount of US$11.995 million in 2005 dollars.
The bottom line on price is that 1) for the items included in the MEG contract, Zakhem’s price is US$1,924,000 lower than the MEG price for those items and 2) the Zakhem contract provides an additional US$13,757,547 of necessary improvements that were not covered under the MEG contract.

Prepared by Harry A. Greaves, Managing Director, with assistance from legal counsel and technical consultants --- June 15, 2009

My Body Gone, My Soul Remains With You

A farewell note from Michael Jackson aka Jay Nagbe Sloh

My dearest fans worldwide:

After an exciting and memorable stint with this troublesome world, I write to inform you that yesterday was my last day at work. I have left my position as King of Pop Music at Hollywood International, a "company" you and I formed and faiuthfully served over the past 45 years. I bid adieu to you - my children, my brothers, my sisters, other relatives, and - above all - my esteemed fans accross the world. But, before leaving, I wanted to take this opportunity to let you know what a great and distinct pleasure it has been to sing and dance for you throughout my life. For nearly as long as I have worked here, I knew I would leave this company one day, somehow. And, now that this dream has become a reality, please know that I could not have reached this goal without your unending support. No amount of words can express my gratitude for the support expressed in many ways.

Why now?
My body needed rest, and so it is gone to where there is no more sweat, no more tears, no more painful medical drugs, no more suffering. I wanted to do my best in completing my existing responsibilities and then ensuring a smooth transition, but when the Heavenly Father calls, we must answer. He has called, and I must abandon everyone and everything to respond. This decision was not an easy one, and it took a lot of consideration. I really wanted to continue working with this wonderful "company" of ours, including a planned trip to Europe next week. However, He knows best, and I must obey His orders. I think His decision is in the best interest of all of us. Yes, my body is gone from you, but my soul and spirit remain. I have enjoyed the wonderful opportunity of working with you all. During the last 45 years, you all have provided me unflinching support and, through your encouragement and guidance, I have been able to excel easily. With many of you, I have shared a unique camaraderie which I hope will continue in the years to come, eventhough I will not be here with you anymore. I thank God for giving me such a wonderful army of supporters.

Prior notice
I could not give you prior notice of my departure because I, too, did not know His call was coming. But that's how our Father designed it. I am sure He planned it this way because He did not want all of us to suffer cardiac arrest and go together. I believe He wants to meet and greet each of us at different intervals and different times set by Him.

Place for you
I am going to prepare a place where you and I will sing and dance together again sooner than you can imagine. As I move on, I would like to take a moment to remember and cherish our times together. It has been great interacting with each of you in so many ways.

New career
Even though I will miss you all, I beg that you worry not, for I am going to start a new phase of my career - the new challenge of singing and dancing before a bigger and happier audience, which includes our Father who is in Heaven. My new assignment brings forth new challenges and adds more diverse experience to my career.

I am sorry
I admit I was not perfect as a mortal being. As such, I did somethings that anger some people. It was difficult for me to please all. Even Christ, our Savior, could not. But now that I am out of the way, I ask those who held things against me to forgive me and let go their anger. For you, too, I am going to work for a reunion that knows no anger.

Gates of Heaven
I love you all, but I must go now for our Father awaits me at the Gates of Heaven. Please don't bother responding as, at this very moment, I am in my shuttle doing a million miles per hour with the windows down.

See you, not good-bye
Remember, this is not a goodbye. It is only "hasta luego" or "see you later."




BIOGRAPHY of Michael Jackson
Culled from http://www.allmichaeljackson.com/biography.html

The Bio History of Michael Joseph Jackson began when he was born on the 29th of August 1958 in Gary, Indiana. He was the 7th of nine children. (brothers: Sigmund "Jackie", Toriano "Tito", Jermaine, Marlon, Steven "Randy", and sisters Rebbie, Janet and La-Toya JacksonMichael began his musical career at the age of 5 as the lead singer of the Jackson 5 who formed in 1964. In these early years the Jackson 5, Jackie, Jermaine,Tito,Marlon and lead singer Michael played local clubs and bars in Gary Indiana and moving further afield as there talents grew and they could compete in bigger competitions. From these early days Michael would be at the same clubs as big talented stars of there days, such as Jackie Wilson and would be learning from them even back then. In 1968 the Bobby Taylor and The Vancouvers discovered the Jackson five and from there they got an audition for Berry Gordy of Motown Records. The Jackson 5 signed for Motown and moved to California. Their first 4 singles, "I Want You Back", "ABC", "The Love You Save", and "I'll Be There" all made US No1 hits. The Jackson 5 recorded 14 albums and Michael recorded 4 solo albums with Motown. The Jackson 5 stayed with Motown until 1976, wanting more artistic freedom they felt they had to move on and signed up with Epic. The group name Jackson 5 had to be changed as it was owned by Motown, so they reverted to The Jacksons as they had be known in the early days. Brother Jermaine married Berry Gordy's daughter and stayed with Motown. Youngest brother Randy joined in his place. The Jacksons had a number of hit recordsand in total made 6 albums between the years of 1976 and 1984. In 1977 Michael made his first film debut when he starred in the musical 'The Wiz' playing Scarecrow with Diana Ross in the lead role of Dorothy. It was at this time Michael met Quincy Jones who was doing the score for the film. Michael teamed up with Quincey Jones as his producer for his first solo album with Epic Records. The album titled "Off The Wall" was a big success around the world and the first ever album to release a record breaking 4 No1 singles in the US. In 1982 Michael Jackson released the world's largest selling album of all time, 'Thriller'. This album produced 7 hit singles, breaking yet again more records, and went on to sell over 50 million copies worldwide. Michael was keen to use music video or short films as he called them to promote his singles from the album. He worked with the best directors and producers, using the latest technology and special effects.for the hit song 'Billie Jean' The short film 'Thriller' used the latest make-up artists technolgy combined with fantastic dancing and cherography, to produce a 14 minute video, with a start, a middle and an ending. So successful was this video that 'The Making Of Michael Jackson's Thriller' became the world's largest selling home video combined with soaring album sales. In 1983 Michael performed the now legendary moonwalk for the first time on the 'Motown 25 years' anniversary show. This performance alone set Michael undoubtable into the realm of a superstar.
In 1984 Michael won a record breaking 8 Grammy awards in one night. The awards were for his work on the 'Thriller' album and his work on the narrative for the 'ET Storybook'.
On December 9th 1984 at the last concert of the Jackson's Victory Tour, Michael announced he was splitting from the group and going solo.
In 1987 Michael released his much awaited third solo album, titled 'Bad', and lauched his record breaking first solo world tour. 1988, Michael wrote his first autobiography talking for the first time on his childhood and his career. At the end of the 1980s Michael was named 'Artist Of The Decade' for his success off of his 'Thriller' and 'Bad' albums. In 1991 Michael signed with Sony Music the largest ever recording contract and released his fourth solo album, 'Dangerous'. He toured world again in 1992, taking his concerts to countries that had never before been visited by a pop/rock artist. Also Michael founded the 'Heal the World Foundation' to help improve the lives of children across the world. In 1994 Michael married Lisa Marie Presley, daughter of rock legend Elvis Presley. The marriage only lasted for 19 months, as they divorced in 1996. 1995 saw Michael release a fifth solo album, 'HIStory', which was a double album, first half new material and second half half greatest hits. Michael toured again over a legs covering a 2 year period. In between legs of the tour on November 14th 1996, Michael married for his second time to Debbie Rowe who was a nurse that Michael had met in the treatment of his skin pigment disorder. Together they had their first child Prince Michael Joseph Jackson jr born on February 13 1997 and a daughter Paris Michael Katherine Jackson born on April 3rd 1998. In 1997 Michael released the remix album 'Blood On The Dance Floor' which also contained 5 new song linked with a 38min film "Ghosts". This film Michael played 5 roles using the latest special effects and make-up artistry, combined with his dance and music.In September, 2001 Michael celebrated his 30th anniversary as a solo artist with two concerts to be held in New York, USA. Many artists such as Whitney Houston, Usher, Destinys Child, Shaggy and many more performed there own and Michael Jacksons past songs. Michael then reunited with all of his brothers performed there biggest hits. Michael then went onto perform solo some of his biggest hits. In October 2001 Michael released the album 'Invincible' so far releasing only 2 singles including the big hit "You Rock My World". Since the release of this first single the album has been surrounded by rumours of a rift with Sony Music and a clear lack of promotion of the album.

Why Grand Gedeh Association Should Change Leadership On May 24th

Introduction: On May 24, 2009, the great people of Grand Gedeh County in the Americas will assemble in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for their annual convention. This convention promises to be a crowd puller for two primary reasons: First, Pennsylvania and its neighbors host the highest amount of Grand Gedeans in the Americas. Second, this year’s convention will elect a president and other executive officers who will run the Grand Gedeh Association in the Americas for the next two years. Already, the Association’s Elections Commission has cleared candidates for the various positions – president, vice president, secretary, treasurer, and chaplain. Maryland-based current President Henry Kohn Glay, seeking a second term, is being challenged by Pennsylvania-based Martha A. Kannah, referred to by supporters as the Association’s “Iron Lady.” Following a thorough research into the lives and community activities of the two presidential candidates, coupled with a careful analysis of their campaign platforms, the Sloh Information Service, the world’s fastest and most accurate media outlet, endorses “Iron Lady” Matha Aldolphine Kannah for the presidency of the Grand Gedeh Association in the Americas.

Always composed in any situation: Martha, seen here, is poised to restore lost confidence and credibility in the Grand Gedeh Association in the Americas. She tells the truth consistently.
Why Kannah, and not Glay: There are times when people look at someone in society and say, “He or she is a born leader.” This statement is usually based on certain characteristics found in the person that naturally make others see him/her as a leader. Whether a person is born a leader or develops skills and abilities to become a leader is open for debate. However, there are some clear characteristics that identify good leaders. These qualities can be developed or may be naturally part of one’s personality. Below are few of such qualities that informed our endorsement of Mrs. Kannah:

Honesty and integrity: A leader must be trusted and be known to live their life with honesty and integrity. True authority is born from respect for the good character and trustworthiness of the person who leads. Martha is a good leader with an exemplary character. She is trustworthy to lead others. She is a good leader who “walks the talk” and, in doing so, earns the right to have responsibility for others.

Enthusiasm, passion, and dedication: Good leaders are enthusiastic about their works, causes, and roles. People respond more openly to a leader of passion and dedication. A leader must be a source of inspiration. S/he must be a motivator towards the required action or cause. The responsibilities and roles of a leader may be different from others, but the leader must be seen as part of the team working towards the goal. Martha is enthusiastic about any assignment she is given. She has a history of working with passion and dedication. She leads by example. She is not afraid to roll up her sleeves and get dirty.

Confidence: A good leader is confident. In order to lead and set direction a leader needs to appear confident as a person and in the leadership role. Such a person inspires confidence in others and draws out the trust and best efforts of the team to complete the task well. A leader also needs to function in an orderly and purposeful manner in situations of uncertainty. People look to the leader during times of uncertainty and unfamiliarity and find reassurance and security when the leader portrays confidence and a positive demeanor. Martha has proven to be a leader who conveys confidence towards the proposed objective and inspires the best effort from team members.

Tolerance and composure: Good leaders are tolerant of ambiguity and remain calm, composed and steadfast to the main purpose. Martha is the kind of leader who takes storms, emotions, and crises as part of the journey and keeps a cool head.

Focus and analytical skills: A good leader keeps the main goal in focus, and is able to think analytically. Not only does a good leader view a situation as a whole, but is also able to break it down into sub parts for closer inspection. Not only does Martha keep her goals in full view, she equally breaks them down into manageable steps and makes progress towards them.

Conclusion: A good leader is committed to excellence. Second best does not lead to success. The good leader not only maintains high standards, but also is proactive in raising the bar in order to achieve excellence in all areas. The above characteristics are foundational to good leadership. Some characteristics may be more naturally present in the personality of a leader. However, each of these characteristics can also be developed and strengthened. A good leader whether they naturally possess these qualities or not, will be diligent to consistently develop and strengthen them in their leadership role. This is where Martha Kannah is always at her best. And, based on the information above, we urge the people of Grand Gedeh County to lift their great organization above the fray by voting for a change that helps both their organization and its people back home in Liberia.

Young Liberian in the Skies

As a little boy in Ducorfree, Sinoe County Sloh Wea told himself "I believe I can fly" and some of us heard him. Today, that little boy with what seemed at a time an impossible dream is not only flying but teaching others how to fly. See story below:

Meet Assistant Chief Pilot Shannon Wea
When you first meet Shannon, you immediately get a smile and hear a wonderful accent. His back-groung is lengthy and admirable, as he was born in Liberia, which is located on the west coast of Africa.

Since early childhood, he has always wanted to be a pilot. Well, after a long trek, he achieved his goal. Shannon joined our school late last summer when the airlines cut back - their loss was our gain.

Shannon takes great joy when someone walks through the door with no knowledge of aviation and he can make him/her learn to fly - he feels very proud.

Shannon received his primary, elementary and middle school education in Liberia. In 1989 while in middle school, a rebel incursion launched by Charles G. Taylor toppled the legitimate government of Samuel K. Doe, the elected president of Liberia. The Taylor militia disrupted and destroyed the political, social, academic infrastructure and the fabric of Liberia, a peaceful nation. The name Liberia originated from the word liberty, which means free. Liberia was founded to repatriate the freed slaves who were willing o return to Africa from the United States after the emancipation proclamation by Abraham Lincoln. The freed slaves who were sent back to Africa joined the aborigines they met there and the two groups lived in harmony in what is now called Liberia.

The Taylor rebel incursion haunted Liberia for the next 14 years. Shannon and two of his sibling sought refuge in Ghana, also located on the west coast, to survive the tyranny and anarchy from the rebels that preyed on Liberians. After receiving no formal education for four successive years due to the Taylor rebel war, Shannon was left with a 9th grade education at age 20. But throughout it all, Shannon never stopped pursuing his dream to become educated and become a pilot. He enrolled in Prince Boating Middle School in Nsawam in eastern Ghana. There he completed his middle school education and later enroll in the secondary school where he completed 11th grade.

After 11th grade, Shannon and his siblings joined their mother who had migrated to the UN in 1987. In 1996 when he arrived, he took the GED and completed his high school education. He relocated to Trenton to make his aviation dream a reality when he enrolled in Mercer County Community College. He earned his Associates Degree in Aviation Flight Technology and all of his FAA ratings. Eventually he earned a BS in Flight Technology from Thomas Edison State College and a Masters degree in Management from Thomas Edison State College.

When asked what was his most memorable day as a pilot, "My first solo!" And Shannon's favorite airplane is the Cessna 172 - it's very forgiving, especially with students, and it is very comfortable. Shannon hope to fly for an airline in the near future, however he happily works at RVFS.

Shannon has a six year old son, also Shannon Wea II, who is in kindergarten in Trenton.
We enjoy having Shannon on our staff, and we hope his dreams are kept alive.

Culled from the Princeton Airport Newsletter

The terror Liberians faced every day

ABC News' Tom Sawyer takes you into Liberia's brutal civil war. Click here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2DA7tZD2OLc&NR=1

A touching message for all Liberians

Liberian musical stars, Zack Roberts and Geebah Swaray, have a message for all Liberians. Click here to hear that marvelous song: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k-dSUUBkldw&feature=related

Harry Fumba Moniba Foundation Established

Philadelphia, 03/12/09 - A foundation honoring the late Dr. Harry Fumba Moniba, former Vice President of Liberia, has been established by the Moniba Family. The formal launching of "The Dr. Harry Fumba Moniba Foundation" is scheduled for Monday, March 16, according to his widow, Mrs. Minita Kollie Moniba.
Dr. Moniba died in a two-car accident on November 24, 2004 in Michigan while preparing to launch his campaign for the Liberian presidency in the 2005 election Ellen Sirleaf "won."

Mrs. Moniba told the Sloh Information Service today that although her late husband may not have driven his putting “Liberia First” campaign to completion, "he had a clear vision and tirelessly articulated it." She said Dr. Moniba "wanted to provide a leadership that is selfless, inclusive, and exemplary," adding, "He cared about Liberia and had a passion for putting national interest above his own."

She recalled that her father was "unwavering in his commitment to peace and respect for rule of law – a commitment which his few critics took for weakness, although many of his supporters and admirers see his non-violent stance as strength."
She said the Moniba Family and true friends believe that his dedication to a peaceful change was a major stabilizing factor in the successful creation of the multi-party system which today forms the basis for violence-free competitive elections even in post-war Liberia.
"In his home going, he did not only leave behind a lasting memory of a loving husband, father, grandfather, and brother, he also left a legacy of national leadership with honesty and integrity which is to be admired and emulated. Part of his ever lasting legacy will be the shining example he set for his fellow citizens in that hard work, dedication and love for a country will drive a man to do great things, and, thus, a nation to do great things," she noted.
Mrs. Moniba demonstrated unwavering gratitude to friends of the Moniba family by saying, "I want to sincerely thank all those who have continued to identify with us during and after our period of bereavement. Your overwhelming outpouring of concerns and affections continues to remind us of the positive impact that Dr. Moniba made in the lives of those around him as well as in national and foreign affairs."
She concluded, "I want to ask that you join us in keeping Dr. Moniba's leadership vision alive in the years ahead by working to make our great country of Liberia a place where democracy, freedom of speech, and the liberty of its citizens exist for the greater good of all Liberians."

ULAA Inauguration Continues to Pull Big Names

...NEKTAA, SIS Boss accepts Kesselly invitation
...Who will be left out?

Philadelphia, 3/11/09 (SIS) - The National President of the New Krutown Association in the Americas (NEKTAA), Mr. Jay Nagbe Sloh, has received and subsequently accepted an invitation from the President of the Union of Liberian Associations in the Americas (ULAA), Mr. Anthony Varfilay Kesselly, to attend the Union's inaugural festivities scheduled for this weekend in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

In his official invitation to President Sloh on March 7, 2009, President Kesselly said "This comes as a formal invitation to you and your Organization, the New Krutown Association in the Americas, to attend the Inaugural Dinner Ball of the Union of Liberian Associations in the Americas, slated to take place in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, on Saturday, March 14, 2009."

President Kesselly informed President Sloh that he and his corps of officers were elected by ULAA's 34th National General Assembly held in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, on October 4, 2008, and that they were duly sworn into office in Chicago, Illinois, on November 15, 2008, in keeping with the Union's Elections Timetable. Now comes the inaugural ball, to which we humbly request the honor of your presence," President Kesselly noted.

In his official letter of acceptance to President Kesselly yesterday, President Sloh , who is also managing editor of the internationally acclaimed Sloh Information Service, said: “We present our compliments, and have the honor to officially acknowledge receipt of, and respond to, your invitation for us to attend the Union's inaugural Ball scheduled for March 14, 2009 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.”

He added: “NEKTAA notes, with thanks and appreciation, your track record of supporting its programs over the years. We also note, with interest, your assurance that our patronage of your program will assist foster some of your service delivery objectives. Additionally, we are gratified by the fact that your National Treasurer, Honorable Emmanuel Nimely Togba, is our own National Secretary-general.”

President Sloh further informed President Kesselly, “Based on the above, we gladly accept your invitation and will do everything within our powers and resources not only to attend this program, but mainly to ensure the overall success of your Administration.”

Sloh said NEKTAA, as a Liberian organization, looks forward to a productive partnership with ULAA in the two organizations' service delivery objectives.

“We wish you success, and avail our personal and official support as you begin the difficult task of rebuilding a ULAA that is much more responsive to the needs and aspirations of the Liberian people,” he concluded.